Skip to content

Commit 613b0a6

Browse files
authored
Tests: improve Windows compatibility (#608)
1 parent 84b79a9 commit 613b0a6

File tree

1 file changed

+15
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+15
-3
lines changed

features/post.feature

Lines changed: 15 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -569,7 +569,11 @@ Feature: Manage WordPress posts
569569

570570
@require-wp-5.0
571571
Scenario: Get block_version field for post with blocks
572-
When I run `wp post create --post_title='Block Post' --post_content='<!-- wp:paragraph --><p>Hello block world</p><!-- /wp:paragraph -->' --porcelain`
572+
Given a block-post.html file:
573+
"""
574+
<!-- wp:paragraph --><p>Hello block world</p><!-- /wp:paragraph -->
575+
"""
576+
When I run `wp post create block-post.html --post_title='Block Post' --porcelain`
573577
Then STDOUT should be a number
574578
And save STDOUT as {POST_ID}
575579

@@ -581,7 +585,11 @@ Feature: Manage WordPress posts
581585

582586
@require-wp-5.0
583587
Scenario: Get block_version field for post without blocks
584-
When I run `wp post create --post_title='Classic Post' --post_content='<p>Just plain HTML</p>' --porcelain`
588+
Given a classic-post.html file:
589+
"""
590+
<p>Just plain HTML</p>
591+
"""
592+
When I run `wp post create classic-post.html --post_title='Classic Post' --porcelain`
585593
Then STDOUT should be a number
586594
And save STDOUT as {POST_ID}
587595

@@ -593,7 +601,11 @@ Feature: Manage WordPress posts
593601

594602
@require-wp-5.0
595603
Scenario: Get block_version field included in default output
596-
When I run `wp post create --post_title='Test Post' --post_content='<!-- wp:heading --><h2>Title</h2><!-- /wp:heading -->' --porcelain`
604+
Given a heading-post.html file:
605+
"""
606+
<!-- wp:heading --><h2>Title</h2><!-- /wp:heading -->
607+
"""
608+
When I run `wp post create heading-post.html --post_title='Test Post' --porcelain`
597609
Then STDOUT should be a number
598610
And save STDOUT as {POST_ID}
599611

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)