-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
fix(neon): unsigned bitwise shifts are never called #1266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
serge-sans-paille
merged 4 commits into
xtensor-stack:master
from
AntoinePrv:neon-rshift
Mar 6, 2026
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just
xsimd::all(b >= 0)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That does not work because
kernel::allon which it depends is declared below.Would also require compare utilities to be declared.
This is not the only case where I find it hard to reuse other functions, with possibly circular include loops.
With all the SFINAE, forward declaring all of them is not very maintainable.
(In C++17 we could get rid of all SFINAE in favor of
if constexprand have simple signatures that we can easily forward declare).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the C++17 simplification. But that's for another day. meanwhile you could at least store to a buffer and call
std::all_of?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@serge-sans-paille I'm happy to do the changes, but not sure it will be for the best.
What is the objective? Less assertion code? No extra visible symbol (
all_positive)?If we want to get rid of
all_positivethen we would need at least this in all functions. Possibly more with#ifdef NDEBUGto avoid warnings given[[maybe_unused]]is C++17.std::array<T, batch<T, A>> tmp = {}; rhs.store(tmp.data()); assert(std::all_of(tmp.begin(), tmp.end(), [](auto x) { return x >= 0; }));Or do you mean to use
std::all_ofinsideall_positive?