Deleted

[sam-kleiner]

Deleted

[classabbyamp]

we're not interested in contributions generated by so-called artificial intelligence

[zdykstra]

I read the post. I'll happily engage with a human that's raised concerns or requested additional information on something. What I won't do is read through a tool regurgitating my own documentation back to me, and then figuring out if it got it subtly wrong. If there's something you'd like to see added - feel free to request it directly. But don't expect anybody here to dig through a chat log with an LLM for inspiration on how to improve our docs.

[zdykstra]

Again - happy to have a discussion directly with you about how to safely interact with encrypted datasets and what their pitfalls are. If you come here with questions, you'll likely get answers. If you come here with a request for maintainers to review the output of an LLM / plagiarism machine for accuracy, you'll get told that we're not interested.

With all of that said, do you have a specific topic that we can help explain in greater detail? We have a long-standing PR for a basic FAQ, some of your questions might be a good fit for that general document!