Skip to content

zephyrSerial: Keeping up with UART API changes#191

Merged
soburi merged 1 commit into
zephyrproject-rtos:nextfrom
soburi:update_uart_irq_update
May 31, 2026
Merged

zephyrSerial: Keeping up with UART API changes#191
soburi merged 1 commit into
zephyrproject-rtos:nextfrom
soburi:update_uart_irq_update

Conversation

@soburi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@soburi soburi commented May 27, 2026

Update for uart_irq_update() changes introduced with zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#105231.

Update for uart_irq_update() changes introduced with
zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#105231.

Signed-off-by: TOKITA Hiroshi <tokita.hiroshi@gmail.com>
@soburi soburi marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2026 21:36
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 27, 2026 21:36
@soburi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

soburi commented May 27, 2026

@DhruvaG2000
Please do this as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates ZephyrSerial’s IRQ handler to remain compatible with Zephyr’s updated UART interrupt API (per zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#105231), by no longer relying on uart_irq_update()’s previous boolean return semantics.

Changes:

  • Replace the conditional early-return on uart_irq_update() with an unconditional call whose return value is ignored.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@soburi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

soburi commented May 27, 2026

@DhruvaG2000

Please do this as well.

@soburi soburi merged commit 5146532 into zephyrproject-rtos:next May 31, 2026
3 checks passed
@soburi soburi deleted the update_uart_irq_update branch May 31, 2026 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants